|
TrueCrimeReader
Posts:
6
Registered:
1/3/08
|
|
(67 of 67)
Jul 31, 2009 7:19 PM
|
|
Looks like this case is coming to an end. Both Buckman and Walton have pled guilty. Sentencing for Walton is 9/11/09 Sentencing for Buckman is 10/9/09 Its been 5 years since the murders. The families of the victims will finally have some closure. Its good that they didn't have to go through a long arduous trial.
|
|
|
Mama Cheri 1
Posts:
6
From:
Chandler, Arizona
Registered:
4/1/08
|
|
(66 of 67)
Oct 8, 2008 3:12 PM
|
|
There is alot of confusion on the awareness of the Walton family and ther knowledge of the fact they knew it was the First 48. I know for fact they did not comprehend the movie camera being First 48. They believe it was the Phoenix Police videoing the questioning like they do all interviews. They never recieved any monies, in fact they didn't even know about the show till a friend called them and said they saw it. They were told that they were doing a documentary on the officier who had just return back to work as a homicide detective since his accident. How do you know if Walton will take the stand in his defence? His lawyers have told Walton not to take the stand.It is not up to Walton to prove his innocence but the state's responsiblity to prove his guilt. I don,t believe for one minute that Walton shoot the victims. Yes he has been in trouble with the law several times but nothing that warrents people to assume he is a murderer. I know that this has taken a toll on all the familes involved including the Walton family. Let the jury decided Walton's fate, not the public.
|
|
|
TrueCrimeReader
Posts:
6
Registered:
1/3/08
|
|
(65 of 67)
Oct 7, 2008 11:03 PM
|
|
Now if they were doing a flick on some cop, why would they interview the Waltons? How many times has Mike been arrested by him? Maybe you ought to read the paper before signing. If you had a video camera trained on you, (I think they just use one camera, and its probably not really big) while you were being told your son was suspected of murder, and you were also told the camera was because they were following some officer, that video camera is going to be the very last thing on your mind. You would have no reason to doubt what you were told, and besides your world was just shaken up when you were told your son was a suspect in a triple murder. You aren't thinking straight and you sure as heck are more worried about your son's safety than what the videotape is going to be used for. I'm not sure why the producers try to be deceptive when taping the footage, perhaps they feel that it wouldn't be authentic if the people knew they would be on national TV, and are more likely to be open and act naturally if the presence of the camera was minimized. Mike did sign away his right to a speedy trial. What innocent man is going to sit in jail for 3 years! There have been innocent men sitting in prison for DECADES never mind just a few short years. If you are in jail to be held over for a murder trial, in which you hadn't actually committed the murder, you would certainly be just waiting for the day you could go home. You would naturally assume that the prosecutors would realize their mistake and let you out of jail the next day. The lawyer is your only hope to prove your innocence and he keeps asking for delays in order to better prepare your case. As to if Walton is guilty or innocent, I don't know, but I am certainly not going to draw a conclusion just from the fact he has been sitting in jail for 3 years. Though we know he is used to living in a cage. It must be difficult having a criminal record. People will just assume you are guilty of whatever you are being accused of! From what I have seen of Walton's record, it was mostly drunk driving and auto theft. I don't see how you can assume someone is a killer just from that fact. Lots of people have criminal records, and many have turned the lives around and made something of themselves. You can't just say this person has been in jail so that means he is guilty. That is how many innocent people have ended up in prison. The judge, prosecutors or jury just assume that since this person has a history of being in jail, it must mean he is guilty now. Ask him if he plans on testifing? One of the instructions that judges always give to the jury is to not draw ANY conclusions of the guilt or innocence of the defendant based on their willingness or unwillingness to testify on their own behalf. There are many reasons why a defendant would not want to take the stand, regardless of their innocence or guilt. One big reason is that the prosecutor might choose to indict the defendant based on his past criminal record or behavior and try to show the jury you can't believe the defendant. If the defendant doesn't take the stand, then the jury is not presented with that information. Also, if you really are innocent, then you are confident with the lack evidence and that the prosecutor will not be able to prove you guilty. You are willing to sit back and let facts speak for themselves.
|
|
|
voice for victims
Posts:
2
From:
AZ
Registered:
10/1/08
|
|
(64 of 67)
Oct 5, 2008 4:33 AM
|
|
Now if they were doing a flick on some cop, why would they interview the Waltons? How many times has Mike been arrested by him? Maybe you ought to read the paper before signing. Mike did sign away his right to a speedy trial. What innocent man is going to sit in jail for 3 years! Though we know he is used to living in a cage. Ask him if he plans on testifing?
|
|
|
Mama Cheri 1
Posts:
6
From:
Chandler, Arizona
Registered:
4/1/08
|
|
(63 of 67)
Oct 4, 2008 10:09 AM
|
|
Hear is an update on the Walton/Buckman cases. Walton had a trial management hearing Sept 26. Trial is scheluled to start on Nov. 10 as long as the prosecutor doesn't keep dragging his feet. Yes it has taken 3 years for these trials to get started but by no means do's it indicate that Walton is guilty. As for the show, Walton's family did not receive monies nor did they relize it was the First 48 . They were under the impression that is was the police videoing a shoot on Officer Jason Schidming.Walton has waiting this long because he had no choice. May some closure come soon to the families of the victims.
|
|
|
voice for victims
Posts:
2
From:
AZ
Registered:
10/1/08
|
|
(62 of 67)
Oct 1, 2008 1:21 PM
|
|
I am checking this board for one of family members of a victim. Now I understand why! As if it isn't hard enough losing a family member in this fashion, now we can watch it on t.v. Only Waltons family signed for this program to be made, I don't know if they got paid. Two people were shooting, there were 2 different guns, only one of which was found. My friend says they got them both. There sure seems to be alot of Mike supporters. Get real! If he was innocent he wouldn't have drug this thing out so long. 3 years, come on. They don't exspect him to testify on his own behalf. Guilty people usually don't.
|
|
|
Mama Cheri 1
Posts:
6
From:
Chandler, Arizona
Registered:
4/1/08
|
|
(61 of 67)
Sep 20, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
You are right on how the procudure go's. The state has offered both Walton and Buckman a plea bargin of life without parole. Walton refused the deal and on Sept.26 it is due back in court to set trial date. As for Buckman I am uncertain what he will do. Buckman is the actual shooter in this case and Walton stands to the fact of not being there.Either way justice will be served.It has been a long time coming for all the familie's involved and will be nice to have some closesure. I wish Walton well.
|
|
|
Beer lover
Posts:
2
From:
Los Angeles
Registered:
7/29/08
|
|
(60 of 67)
Aug 1, 2008 3:02 AM
|
|
Thanks for the reply; I'll keep my eyes peeled for developments.
|
|
|
TrueCrimeReader
Posts:
6
Registered:
1/3/08
|
|
(59 of 67)
Jul 31, 2008 4:44 AM
|
|
Any sort of negotiations going on between the attorneys and defendants is not public record. What is most likely going on is the defense knows the evidence the prosecution has and the prosecutor is probably saying something to the effect of, plead guilty and we will recommend life in prison. Go to trial and if you are found guilty we will seek the death penalty. I'm not familiar with how this particular court operates. "Possible change of Plea" could just be an automatically scheduled conference wherein a defendant is given one last chance to plead guilty before all the wheels are set in motion for the trial. Murder trials are very expensive so they try to settle for plea agreements. Or this could have been requested by the defense. You would have to find out who made the motion for this conference. Its really not possible to find out juicy details like you are curious about. True crime book authors make friends with prosectors and investigators and do research at the court in order to write their books. Hopefully someone will write a book about this case, it sure is interesting.
|
|
|
Beer lover
Posts:
2
From:
Los Angeles
Registered:
7/29/08
|
|
(58 of 67)
Jul 29, 2008 7:05 PM
|
I just saw the "Close Ties" episode today (7/29/08) about the triple murder in Phoenix, and was curious as to the status of defendants Michael Walton and Ryan Buckman. I read all of the posts, and looked at the on-line court records. On 7/21/08, it appears that Michael Walton had a settlement conference of some sort and that Walton is considering CHANGING HIS PLEA. A hearing on the CHANGE OF PLEA is set for 8/10/08. Hmmm. Considering he pleaded NOT GUILTY, we all know what his change of plea will be. As to Ryan Buckman, it appears that his trial is set for Sept. 15, 2008, and that he is also engaged in settlement discussions. Anyone have any info on the terms of the deals that the defendants are trying to strike? Here's the link to the court case info on Walton: http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/072008/m3287594.pdf Case No: CR2005-033651 http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/index.asp Buckman case info: http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/052008/m3181894.pdf
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
(57 of 67)
May 3, 2008 2:16 AM
|
|
You can bet your bottom dollar he is the defense attorney.
|
|
|
SeeDubb
Posts:
1
From:
Gilbert
Registered:
5/2/08
|
|
(56 of 67)
May 2, 2008 6:00 PM
|
|
I grew up with one of the kids being charged. How do I find out more info on the trials? I'd like to talk to whoever is handling the investigation. I might be able to help out.
|
|
|
pa_poohbear
Posts:
2
Registered:
3/28/08
|
|
(55 of 67)
Re: "close ties"
Apr 15, 2008 2:32 AM
|
|
U GO MAMA CHERI 1....MIKIE WILL BE FREE OF ALL CHARGES...AND ALL US WHO ARE HURTING WILL REVOICE BUCKMAN WILL PAY I"M VERY CLOSE ALSO I KNOW MIKIE AND BUCKMAN ITS CLEAR TO ME AND MY FAMILY BUCKMAN DID IT MIKIE IS BEING FRAMED BY A COWARD...THE VICTIMS FAMILIES WILL SEE I STAND BESIDE MAMA CHERI 1 150% AS WELL AS MICKIE
|
|
|
buttercups
Posts:
9,639
Registered:
4/5/05
|
|
(54 of 67)
Re: "close ties"
Apr 12, 2008 1:03 PM
|
|
It's so sickening to think of
|
|
|
Mama Cheri 1
Posts:
6
From:
Chandler, Arizona
Registered:
4/1/08
|
|
(53 of 67)
Re: "close ties"
Apr 11, 2008 6:14 PM
|
|
You are so right. The verdict will be in the hands of the jury and I for one believe they will find Michael Walton innocent and Ryan Buckman guilty.As of today there still is no evidence that link Walton to the crime but everything has Buckmans DNA all over the place. Buckman had extreme motive to want to frame Walton and all of that will come out in court when Buckman takes the stand against Walton. It will show that Buckman is a liar and did this terrible crime to 3 beautiful young people. The jury selection stats July 9 and the trial begins Aug. 18 Don't misunderstand me,I am aware of Walton's past too but he would never kill anyone. My prayers go out to the families and friend's of the 3 victims. It was something that should have never happened. If the police had took serious the threates Buckman has many to several people maybe this could have been provented. At least he can't hurt anyone else now.
|
|
|
|
|