|
Gooddog
Posts:
6
Registered:
9/14/04
|
|
(5 of 5)
Sep 14, 2004 12:23 PM
|
|
I am in total agreement. I was suckered into watching thinking the movie was about Ridgeway. Even if I had wanted to dive into the putrid waters of Bundy?s mind one more time, this film offered nothing new. The performances of the cast (every one of them) was disappointing.
What has happened to the one place on my television that once offered sustenance for mind and soul?
|
|
|
dave1
Posts:
19
Registered:
9/8/04
|
|
(4 of 5)
Sep 12, 2004 6:17 PM
|
|
I totally disagree about your zero rating. From a #1 to a #10, how about a minus 5. #1 is giving the picture too high a rating.
|
|
|
bweir
Posts:
1
Registered:
9/7/04
|
|
(3 of 5)
Sep 7, 2004 2:04 PM
|
|
I didn't think the movie a waste of time but could have been more accurately named Ted Bundy. The content dealt mostly with Bundy rather than the Green River killings !
|
|
|
Arudd
Posts:
2
Registered:
9/6/04
|
|
(2 of 5)
Sep 6, 2004 10:23 PM
|
|
> I was very disappointed. A total waste of my time;
> not at all what I expected... I can't help but shake
> my head in disappointment... horrorible. 1 out of 10
> I give it a big ZERO!
I agree
|
|
|
KriTick11
Posts:
1
Registered:
9/6/04
|
|
(1 of 5)
Sep 6, 2004 10:07 PM
|
|
I was very disappointed. A total waste of my time; not at all what I expected... I can't help but shake my head in disappointment... horrorible. 1 out of 10 I give it a big ZERO!
|
|
|
|
|
