The mother- she's guilty as sin

> >>>And the oddest thing of all is what the husband
> said to the lead investigator the night of the
> tragedy. His comments were about how "beautiful
> Darlie is" and "aren't her breasts large and
> beautiful" , etc.<<<
>
> really? is there a link where i could read about
> this?



http://www.justicefordarlie.net/transcripts.php

Here you go. Here's a link to the transcripts. You'll have to find what you are looking for on your own.

--
It's not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog....

I also think she did it, with help from her husband.

I am a mom, who lost a child, and i couldn't stop crying for months. I wanted to die myself.

People had to pull me away from the grave, for I was digging with my own hands.

Darlie didn't even drop a tear when she saw her boys lying on a slab, or in their graves. In fact, she threw a party.

When we buried our daughter ( died of natural causes) nobody was allowed near her grave. I was that protective.

And she has a film crew there when she went to the graves?????? Sick

Not waking up, but the dog always attacks people he doesn't know????

Why didn't the dog go for the intruder???

Simply...she was the intruder.......

If my ohter kids even cough during the night, i am awake, and she didn't hear a thing???

Yeah right...

And the list goes on and on....

> jellyb, hello.
> These sequents of events that you have outlined,
> bothers me as well. The time frame is wrong.
> As I've posted before, I really dislike this Darlie
> individual, but that is not what makes a killer.
> Her family & friends testified that on 3 various
> occassions - the third being the night of the attacks
> - that Darlie asked her husband for a separation.
> He also admitted to detectives that he had sought out
> someone to pull a b&e for insurance purposes.
> And the oddest thing of all is what the husband said
> to the lead investigator the night of the tragedy.
> His comments were about how "beautiful Darlie is" and
> "aren't her breasts large and beautiful" , etc.
> What father would be concentrating on this when their
> 2 sons were so viciously murdered? He was standing in
> the room where his one son's body lay on the floor,
> covered by a sheet and this is what he chooses to
> discuss?
> Something really 'hinky' here, I'll tell ya'.

Wilma, Darin didn't admit anything to detectives. In fact the b&e story surfaced 6 years after the murders. Read my previous post on the timeline...

> I believe their mother murdered them and the father
> was probably involved. Why wouldn't an intruder
> bring a weapon with him/her? Espeacilly if the
> intruder is dressed in black!! Did he wear a mask?
> Sounds like the doofus in Home Alone. And I don't
> t care what we DIDN'T see--she could have placed
> those kind of bruises on herself. Just whack
> yourself with a hammer, that will do the trick. And
> of couse she had the time to set a crime scene.
> Isn't that what 1st degree murder is?! Its planned,
> , its premeditated, so that you can swim in the
> storm. And how...HOW can you SLEEP through your
> children being attacked like that? And the baby
> upstairs keeps you awake? Stupid! And the knife
> thing--NONE of that adds up to an intruder. The
> detectives are right. And if all this were not
> enough, there is the party by the gravesites...She
> looked like she was vacationing in Malibu. The whole
> family did. I don't care what the jury didn't see.
> Her husband seemed much more eager to talk about when
> they met,how they met, their money, their
> lifestyle--with a smile. WE DON'T CARE! Two kids
> are dead!

The knife does puzzle me. The gravesite party does not, I consider that normal. (yes I know most of you young will not understand, I have 4 kids)

The knife though bothers me alot. I don't consider it overwhelming evidence though. In fact I consider it underwhelming. There is a theory that it was a teenager breaking in with thoughts of raping her.

Many consider the knife proof positive because it was apparently used to break OUT, not in. But none consider that he just walked right in the front door. I live in a small town. Rockwall (that's it right) is close to dallas, but it's still a pretty small community and one most people consider a very safe one. I can tell you that where I live we don't lock our doors and it's unusual for us NOT to leave our keys in the car. As I type this, my doors are all unlocked. I probably will not lock them (unless something creeps me out) before I go to bed, and I have 2 cars in the driveway, both of which are unlocked WITH the keys in the ignition.

Many people, since most DO live in cities can't imagine that people DO live this way. Since I've been an adult and raising children (in an unlocked house, with the keys in the care, barn unlocked too, didn't mention that earlier) I've only ever had one thing stolen from me. A motorcycle helmet. I never found out who got it, I never bothered to report it to the police.

considering the routiers less than urban beginnings. I'd be surprised if the front door was locked. they lived in a community that was well known for being safe.

I myself lean towards the belief that this was a lust driven crime. The youngster was obviously no professional. The wounds on the children were haphazard, there is evidence his frantic attempts to kill were ineffective. I believe when it came to confronting the object of his lust (and she was a gorgeous lady, you're fooling yourself if you think she didn't have what it takes to arouse the lust of more than a few teenage boys) he was not able to strike with such vigor and determination. At this point the boy is purely insane, he's just stabbed two boys, and then the woman he probably fantasized was going to fall in love with him is attacking him. He is seriously at this point in defensive mode and striking with the intent of getting away.

Folks, the blood was all over the place. It was splattered all over the place. There was a serious FIGHT occurred. Bleeding people were moving all around the living room, all over the kitchen, and I don't know how many other places.

You guys will never convince me a mother did that, staged it all, went around splattering blood all over the place to make it look like a great fight.

I'd be willing to examine ANY evidence you guys want to show and I'll bet NONE of you can come up with evidence of a woman EVER in history chasing her kids all over the house stabbing them slowly to death.

Some of you might even bring up the case of the mother that cut her childs arms off and killed her. I don't think it even remotely compares. This woman was OBVIOUSLY insane, and there was never any doubt she did it, because she admitted it right off.

This is FAR FAR if it can be imagined more gruesome. In this case the mother, for the blood evidence to match up to the verdict, she was chasing these kids around, killing them one stab at a time. THEN going back to finish them off when it turns out one of them isn't COMPLETELY dead yet.

I defy any of you to find a single example of a mother doing THAT before.

Of course it is possible, and I'm not discounting the possibility of anybody being that insane. Absolutely not.

I just do NOT believe anybody here (or in the trial) provided ANY evidence that she is/was that insane.

Consider HOW insane that is. Remember that neither of the boys were just cut their throat. Both were savagely killed........ slowly. One SO slowly he was still alive when MRS ROUTIER called 911, and STILL alive when paramedics arrived. Pretty sloppy if you're a parent who is killing your kids. I'm an adult, I could kill a 6 year old that I have premeditatively decided to kill, pretty quick. I could do that WITHOUT leaving evidence it was me that did it.

But who needs evidence problems when you apparently aren't even bothering to set up evidence?

Let's say mom just cut both their throats where they both die quickly and silently. Would her case be LESS strong if it had been done that way? Nope, it would have been stronger. So her case would have been stronger if her children had been quickly silenced and killed rather than savagely brutalized.

I'm speaking towards the theory, at this point, that it was a premeditative act by one parent, the mother.

I don't buy it. If she (or even they) were trying to set up a scene where it would look like somebody else did it. They must be completely retarded. I don't mean to insult underpriveleged people, but retarded people with plenty of time and motive could have arranged the scene a thousand times better to look like an outsider did it.

I believe an innocent woman is sitting on death row charged with the murder of her own children. This is a very, very ugly world. Is there a shadow of a doubt. It's not just a shadow of a doubt, it's the full fledged mirror image of a doubt. We, as a society, are murdering a woman, an innocent woman. The killer of HER and her children roams at large. I will never forget this case.

jellyb, hello.
These sequents of events that you have outlined, bothers me as well. The time frame is wrong.
As I've posted before, I really dislike this Darlie individual, but that is not what makes a killer.
Her family & friends testified that on 3 various occassions - the third being the night of the attacks - that Darlie asked her husband for a separation.
He also admitted to detectives that he had sought out someone to pull a b&e for insurance purposes.
And the oddest thing of all is what the husband said to the lead investigator the night of the tragedy. His comments were about how "beautiful Darlie is" and "aren't her breasts large and beautiful" , etc.
What father would be concentrating on this when their 2 sons were so viciously murdered? He was standing in the room where his one son's body lay on the floor, covered by a sheet and this is what he chooses to discuss?
Something really 'hinky' here, I'll tell ya'.

I'm the mother of three and I hear my children in the night time even when they are coughing. I wake out of my deep sleep. I don't know but I think it's just instinct. She was asleep in the same room her sons where brutally stabbed to death and she says she didn't watch up. The intruders barely left any marks on her body but viciously murdered her little boys? COME on! Their are pictures from the crime scene and her jewelry and purse are sitting on the kitchen counter undisturbed. Isn't that odd. Why would an intruder come inside her home just to kill two little boys? Think about long and hard. It points to one person, DARLIE. I don't think she saw an intruder, I think she killed her son's one by one. How? She probably covered their mouths and stabbed them one after the other until they weren't breathing any more. If they were screaming don't you think the father would have heard them? I know my husband jumps out of bed when he hears the slightest noises in the night. The children and I like to Slumber party in the living room. I don't buy the fact that someone else could have committed this crime. What was the motive? Money and greed. Darlie was running out of money, it drove her crazy and probably one night she snapped. She took her anger out on her children. She probably thought two less problems to deal with. She's a baby killer.

Regarding the bruises:

I once had and IV and the inside of my entire forearm bruised shortly afterwards. Large, dark bruising.

Even when I give blood, the inside of my joint will turn blue.

--
Edited by dailyreader at 07/19/2006 10:17 AM